11 Disconnected Undercut Side Part

11 Disconnected Undercut Side Part

READER COMMENTS ON”$45,588 Per E-Vote for Disabled Voters in Marin County, California”(40 Responses so far…)

11 disconnected undercut hairstyles haircuts (11 update) disconnected undercut side part
11 disconnected undercut hairstyles haircuts (11 update) disconnected undercut side part | disconnected undercut side part

COMMENT #1 [Permalink]… Dredd said on 11/25/2007 @ 4:16 am PT…

Wow “$55,357.14”, that is akin “cheap at bisected the price”.

But in the best imperialistic nation elections are fronts for big money corporations like ES&S and Diebold, and the vote is alone an afterthought.

COMMENT #2 [Permalink]… Phil said on 11/25/2007 @ 6:37 am PT…

Beats me how they absolve that abundant money.

I accept an idea.

17 * $55357 is $941069.00

$140K for 200 COMPUTERS and 200 PRINTERS and INK PAPER$800K to be broken up amid the duke counters, the Distinct programmer to blazon the template, and all the accoutrements and weapons to assure the vote from the all the terrorists.$1069 dollars for beer, coffee, pizza, soda, and cigarettes, and added “medical” things to smoke.

I anticipate some money will be larboard over.Maybe pay for added cardboard and ink–safety factor? Maybe pay for the Bus Fare to go vote? Or booty a pizza home with ya? Airfare and auberge for poll workers? Or Maybe buy some chickens for a ancestors in Guatemala? A meal for a abandoned Katrina victim?

Marin canton is below ecology advance from alembic oil, so this adventure will allegedly get active on CH 7 or 9 or whatever admission it is bottomward there. Although it’s arcade division now, all their “news journalists” are at the arcade malls and airports, acceptable arcade will awning up the story.

I adulation Marin, I do appointment the cafeteria in Molly Stones bottomward there, they accept the analgesic olive bread. I aces up breach and go bottomward and watch the kayak’s practice, and alcohol a beer.

COMMENT #3 [Permalink]… flex said on 11/25/2007 @ 10:07 am PT…

Thanks Brad!

How adamantine is this to understand? Every victim should sue ES&S’s ass to balance their losses aloof like you’ve been adage all along!

“ES&S, the aggregation which distributes them, is now actuality sued by the Accompaniment of California for deploying uncertified AutoMARK machines in counties beyond the state, in abuse of accompaniment law.”

COMMENT #4 [Permalink]… Brad Friedman said on 11/25/2007 @ 10:36 am PT…

Phil –

My aboriginal algebraic was hardly off. The authentic bulk per vote in Marin on the AutoMARK machines was off by $10,000. I’ve now adapted the numbers in the article, and acclaimed the specific alteration at the bottom.

COMMENT #5 [Permalink]… Agent 99 said on 11/25/2007 @ 10:45 am PT…

I was built-in and aloft in Marin County.

You cannot allege us of actuality tightfisted.

COMMENT #6 [Permalink]… Linda said on 11/25/2007 @ 1:42 pm PT…

So how do you compute the per vote bulk at the belt I assignment at in my county, Sonoma, aloof arctic of Marin County? For the Nov. 2006 election, not one distinct aborigine acclimated either of our two machines. And at the antecedent acclamation held, area we had these machines for the aboriginal time, alone one aborigine voted on one of the machines, and that was adjoin the end of the day because we were BEGGING for addition to use one of them.

Two elections, two machines, one vote absolute casting on them.

Meanwhile, we aren’t advancement our attainable schools, and we can’t assume to be able to acquiesce bloom affliction for all.

COMMENT #7 [Permalink]… Brad Friedman said on 11/25/2007 @ 3:18 pm PT…

Linda said:

Two elections, two machines, one vote absolute casting on them.

Meanwhile, we aren’t advancement our attainable schools, and we can’t assume to be able to acquiesce bloom affliction for all.

Frankly, I ability advance the two issues are afterpiece accompanying than you ability akin accept meant aback you acquaint the animadversion above. Unfortunately.

COMMENT #8 [Permalink]… Juliette said on 11/25/2007 @ 8:16 pm PT…

Next why don’t you account how abundant it costs per wheelchair user to use anniversary admission congenital for them in a county. Maybe we should aloof acquaint disabled bodies they should never leave the abode because they are too big-ticket for us to bother with them.

COMMENT #9 [Permalink]… Linda said on 11/25/2007 @ 9:20 pm PT…

Dear Juliette,

If these cyberbanking voting machines were REALLY about allowance bedridden voters, afresh they would absolutely board anniversary bedridden aborigine who uses them with an authentic vote, a absolute almanac of that authentic vote, a reasonable adjustment for blockage for the accurateness of the votes casting on them, and they would run on a affairs that belongs to the citizens who accept to vote on them. Disappointingly, this is NOT what these cyberbanking voting machines are absolutely about, any added than NAFTA is about convalescent the allowance and alive altitude for citizens of Mexico and Canada, or about abbreviation the cardinal of non-U.S. citizens who do actionable bound crossings to acquisition work.

Spare me the apocryphal altercation that those of us who altercate these machines, for VERY GOOD REASONS I ability add, are somehow adjoin to spending a reasonable bulk of money for disabled citizens to vote. You ability be able to get abroad with that applesauce on FoxNews, but it won’t fly in a association of better-informed bodies such as this one.

COMMENT #10 [Permalink]… jethro said on 11/25/2007 @ 9:30 pm PT…

Juliette, I abutment your fiscally amenable angle to accumulate them bound in their homes.

Brad, I’m abiding disabled veterans acknowledge acquirements of the capricious spending of tax dollars aloof so they can vote. I can’t delay apprehend your blog on the bulk per wheelchair user to use the caster armchair admission at the St. Louis Board of Elections.

I can accept accusatory about the accepted accompaniment of cyberbanking voting, but not the bulk of authoritative the adapted to vote abreast attainable to all citizens.

COMMENT #11 [Permalink]… Brad Friedman said on 11/25/2007 @ 9:57 pm PT…

Juliette said:

Next why don’t you account how abundant it costs per wheelchair user to use anniversary admission congenital for them in a county. Maybe we should aloof acquaint disabled bodies they should never leave the abode because they are too big-ticket for us to bother with them.

Interesting point, Juliette. As anon as it’s activate that those ramps don’t do what they are declared to do, and can’t be appropriately acclimated by association in wheelchairs (as the e-voting systems fabricated by Sequoia, Diebold, Hart Intercivic, ES&S et al are analogously congenital too low to be wheelchair accessible) amuse let me know.

Also, as anon as the bulk for architecture ramps includes antibacterial all the stairs so association can *only* use ramps — the e-voting agnate has now already happened in counties beyond the country — let me know, and I’ll advice accession some hell about it.

Jethro said:

I can accept accusatory about the accepted accompaniment of cyberbanking voting, but not the bulk of authoritative the adapted to vote abreast attainable to all citizens.

If that was either the point, or the success of the scheme, I’d be adapted their with ya, Jethro. Such as the absolute activity is a betray from top to bottom, however, I’m not falling for it, and neither should you.

Witness the aloft CA SoS’ torpedoing of a low-tech, bargain band-aid which does the aforementioned thing, while in the accordingly certifying every non-working, hackable, big-ticket cyberbanking addition and you’ll activate to see aloof the tip of the iceberg. Peruse addition thousand or so accessories actuality in the BRAD BLOG archives, and you may akin get a glimpse of the abstract itself.

COMMENT #12 [Permalink]… jethro said on 11/25/2007 @ 10:02 pm PT…

Brad, what was the low-tech, bargain solution?

COMMENT #13 [Permalink]… jethro said on 11/25/2007 @ 10:04 pm PT…

Never mind. I aloof apprehend your blog again.

COMMENT #14 [Permalink]… Michelle Gabriel said on 11/25/2007 @ 10:05 pm PT…

I had heard, but don’t accept annihilation to aback it up, that abounding polling places are not wheelchair accessible. I apperceive that Automark is for assorted disabilities, but I see the altercation actuality about caster armchair ramps. So I anticipate it is ironic,if true, that you accept the accessories for accessiblity of voting, but it’s not attainable to abounding of those who charge it.

This shows the abridgement of compassionate and a absolute systems admission to the problem. Throw an big-ticket band-aid out there for one baby allotment of the all-embracing problem.

COMMENT #15 [Permalink]… Juliette said on 11/25/2007 @ 10:33 pm PT…

Brad, Linda, et al,

The AutoMARK in catechism is artlessly a acclamation appearance accessory (not a tabulator). It marks the aforementioned acclamation that anybody abroad marks. It marks them accurately aback appropriately calibrated and it is absolutely absolute in case it is not appropriately calibrated. (I accept voted on them.) I accede it would be nice to accept attainable antecedent software active them, but as it stands, no certified supplier offers that. The bazaar is attainable for anyone to action an attainable antecedent solution.

As for “false arguments”, the absolute altercation in this authentic commodity is bulk per voter. That is what I was commenting on, annihilation else.

The AutoMARK doesn’t sit too low. It aloof sits on a table. You can put it on any acme table bare to be appropriate. Furthermore, the primary user would be visually impaired, not necessarily in a wheelchair.

Pin on bowlcut disconnected undercut side part
Pin on bowlcut disconnected undercut side part | disconnected undercut side part

Please brainwash me on what counties force all voters to *only* vote on AutoMARKs. I agnosticism that has happened anywhere aback the aforementioned acclamation could be apparent by pen (more quickly) and archival the aforementioned way. Furthermore, if that were the case, it would abort your altercation about bulk per voter.

Lastly, while I don’t agnosticism these machines arise with cogent costs to counties, and tax dollars are tax dollars; weren’t best of these purchased with federal grants as allotment of HAVA?

COMMENT #16 [Permalink]… Brad Friedman said on 11/25/2007 @ 10:56 pm PT…

Juliette said:

It marks them accurately aback appropriately calibrated and it is absolutely absolute in case it is not appropriately calibrated. (I accept voted on them.)

And you apperceive that (it marks them accurately) how, exactly? And what if it’s not appropriately calibrated, btw?

Because ES&S banned to abide them to Bowen’s “Top-to-Bottom Review” we don’t absolutely apperceive how accurately they do anything, unfortunately.

And apperception you, I’m a adherent of use of the AutoMARK over added currently certified disabled/blind voting “solutions” for the affidavit you acknowledgment (it marks a cardboard ballot).

But the aggregation which has broadcast it until now, ES&S, is a abhorrent aggregation which has biased articles over and over again, has over-priced the AutoMARK to advance association arise the articles that they accomplish (they alone administer the AutoMARK, essentially, so they’d rather accept association buy their shitty hackable iVotronic DREs instead), and has taken one canton and accompaniment afterwards addition to the cleaners with their mafioso-like “business” tactics.

I accede it would be nice to accept attainable antecedent software active them, but as it stands, no certified supplier offers that.

Actually, I didn’t say annihilation about “open antecedent software” at all here, admitting I’m absolutely a adherent of about arise antecedent cipher if such systems are to be acclimated in any fashion. That said, it’s aloof one baby allotment of bare acclamation reform, and a accessory bandaid at that, to be frank.

The AutoMARK doesn’t sit too low. It aloof sits on a table. You can put it on any acme table bare to be appropriate.

Glad to apprehend it. Again, aback ES&S banned to abide the arrangement to CA’s Top-to-Bottom Review, I’ll accept to booty your chat for it. All the added touch-screen and/or DREs tested, allegedly attainable systems, were activate to not akin accept abundant allowance below them for a wheelchair by CA’s accessibility study.

Furthermore, the primary user would be visually impaired, not necessarily in a wheelchair.

Um, so you’re affronted with me for calling out an cool $45k bulk tag per vote here, but accommodating to bung wheelchair users over the side??

Please brainwash me on what counties force all voters to *only* vote on AutoMARKs.

No counties, as far as I know. But abounding counties accept done absolutely that with the added declared “accessible” DRE systems such as the Sequoia Edge, Diebold TS, ES&S iVotronic, Hart Intercivic Eagle, etc.

Even Rep. Rush Holt has told me personally, that if it were up to him, *every* aborigine would be voting on an cyberbanking Acclamation Appearance Accessory (though he afield conflated DREs with BMDs)

Lastly, while I don’t agnosticism these machines arise with cogent costs to counties, and tax dollars are tax dollars; weren’t best of these purchased with federal grants as allotment of HAVA?

Not abiding what the point is there. Yeah, best came from tax dollars beatific to the Feds instead of to states. And the aberration is what exactly?

Either way, the tax payer has been screwed, and the blind/disabled accept been acclimated for a boondoggle.

BTW, aback you’ve voted on one before, I’m curious…How does a dark aborigine verify that the AutoMARK has apparent his acclamation as he/she intended?

COMMENT #17 [Permalink]… jethro said on 11/25/2007 @ 11:36 pm PT…

After reviewing the Vote-PAD website it is bright that it will never by certified for use in California. The architect does not feel this artefact requires federal acceptance akin admitting it uses Excel macros to actualize the audio and administer added bureaucracy functions. Following the accepted law not akin Secretary Bowen could accredit the Vote-PAD afterwards it aboriginal accepting Federal certification. Perhaps it would be added able to animate the architect to accredit it federally rather than accusation Bruce McPherson. It absolutely looks like a artefact with abundant potential.

Could you active on your affirmation that I’ve been busted while accordingly actuality acclimated for a boondoggle?

COMMENT #18 [Permalink]… Juliette said on 11/25/2007 @ 11:48 pm PT…

>And you apperceive that (it marks them accurately) how, exactly? And what if it’s not appropriately calibrated, btw?

I apperceive that because I can see the acclamation that comes out. Dark bodies apperceive that by reinserting their apparent ballot. If it isn’t appropriately calibrated, you can blemish the acclamation and revote.

>has over-priced the AutoMARK to advance association arise the articles that they accomplish (they alone administer the AutoMARK, essentially, so they’d rather accept association buy their shitty hackable iVotronic DREs instead)

Not absolutely true. They are currently blame InkaVote in some places, which they additionally do not manufacture. They allegedly bulk their accessories to accumulation amply behindhand if they accomplish or not.

>Again, aback ES&S banned to abide the arrangement to CA’s Top-to-Bottom Review, I’ll accept to booty your chat for it.

Don’t booty my chat for it. Aloof attending at one. It doesn’t booty a Top-to-Bottom analysis to see the activity sits on a table.

>And the aberration is what exactly?

You were advertence bulk to the canton (see article’s aboriginal paragraph) and if the Feds paid for the purchase, it isn’t an authentic appraisal of what the bulk to the canton is.

>How does a dark aborigine verify that the AutoMARK has apparent his acclamation as he/she intended?

They can reinsert a apparent acclamation and it will allege to them (through headphones) what was marked. Yes, there is a assurance activity you can agitation here, but there is no advantage to miscoding it, aback it is programmed to assignment this way afterwards alive the acclamation layouts that will be used. Also, best counties allegedly analysis this action as allotment of their approved testing.

Again, I didn’t column originally to agitation ES&S belief or added equipment. I was aloof commenting on the bulk of franchising visually disabled voters. I saw a dark man who had never apparent his own acclamation above-mentioned to voting on an AutoMARK and his beatitude was priceless!

COMMENT #19 [Permalink]… Brad Friedman said on 11/26/2007 @ 9:08 am PT…

Juliette said:

>And you apperceive that (it marks them accurately) how, exactly? And what if it’s not appropriately calibrated, btw?

I apperceive that because I can see the acclamation that comes out.

I see. So you’ve apparent one (or more) acclamation arise out accurately and you assume it “marks them accurately”. By that acumen then, we could additionally assume that DREs almanac ballots accurately and op-scans do as well. That, admitting testing and real-life occurrences that accept apparent otherwise.

Not aggravating to claiming you, or say that you are wrong. I’m adage that you’re authoritative assumptions agnate to those fabricated beyond the industry that accept authentic amiss time and afresh below absolute analysis by professionals and added real-world situations.

You may like the machines (as do I, in accepted theory, if not beheading and business practices by those who administer them) for disabled/blind voters only, but to acknowledge they mark votes accurately is a benefit-of-the-doubt/logic-leap I’m not able to make.

Blind bodies apperceive that by reinserting their apparent ballot. If it isn’t appropriately calibrated, you can blemish the acclamation and revote.

You beggarly if they apprehension that it isn’t appropriately calibrated, and if the accoutrement letters it to them that way aback the acclamation is re-run, audacious they accept time to do so.

>has over-priced the AutoMARK to advance association arise the articles that they accomplish (they alone administer the AutoMARK, essentially, so they’d rather accept association buy their shitty hackable iVotronic DREs instead)

Not absolutely true. They are currently blame InkaVote in some places, which they additionally do not manufacture. They allegedly bulk their accessories to accumulation amply behindhand if they accomplish or not.

Not from my reporting. We’ve apparent and heard cases from all over the country, area ES&S reps didn’t appearance AutoMARK, or underplayed it, or cher it in adjustment to drive purchasers arise their iVotronic.

As to the InkaVote, the alone abode it’s acclimated in CA is in Los Angeles County, and it’s alone acclimated in addition 2 counties or so abroad in the country. They advance their own gambling/voting machines, usually DREs, added than annihilation else, as that’s area the big money is.

>And the aberration is what exactly?

You were advertence bulk to the canton (see article’s aboriginal paragraph) and if the Feds paid for the purchase, it isn’t an authentic appraisal of what the bulk to the canton is.

If you’re activity to accomplish that asinine distinction, afresh I’ll point you that no, the counties pay for them on their own, and afterwards are re-reimbursed for some or all of the acquirement by the Feds. Not all costs of the machines are covered by the Feds. And yes, it is a bulk to the county, in that they could use that money for added voting systems instead. Perhaps ones that weren’t so over-priced, absolution up allotment for added matters.

>How does a dark aborigine verify that the AutoMARK has apparent his acclamation as he/she intended?

They can reinsert a apparent acclamation and it will allege to them (through headphones) what was marked. Yes, there is a assurance activity you can agitation here, but there is no advantage to miscoding it, aback it is programmed to assignment this way afterwards alive the acclamation layouts that will be used. Also, best counties allegedly analysis this action as allotment of their approved testing.

That’s a accomplished lot of presumptions and assumptions, Juliette. And if you anticipate “there is no advantage to miscoding it…” you’re not acquainted of how hackers work.

Again, I didn’t column originally to agitation ES&S belief or added equipment. I was aloof commenting on the bulk of franchising visually disabled voters. I saw a dark man who had never apparent his own acclamation above-mentioned to voting on an AutoMARK and his beatitude was priceless!

Yes, coincidentally, so accept best supporters of E-voting. From Dodd to McPherson et al. They accept all been confused by the aforementioned declared scene. That’s great.

I’ll be confused aback blind, disabled and non-blind and non-disabled voters can all vote privately, apart and be able to apperceive for assertive that their vote has been counted accurately.

Until then, you’re attractive at a mirage.

COMMENT #20 [Permalink]… Juliette said on 11/26/2007 @ 9:45 am PT…

Haircut tutorial: how to cut & style disconnected side part x uppercut deluxe featherweight disconnected undercut side part
Haircut tutorial: how to cut & style disconnected side part x uppercut deluxe featherweight disconnected undercut side part | disconnected undercut side part

First you accuse about the AutoMARK and afresh you accuse they don’t action them in added places. I apperceive they are blame the InkaVote in at atomic one added accompaniment and they pushed the AutoMARK all over the west. I apperceive hackers aren’t accepted elections by hacking belt machines that see 0 to 1 ballots per election. I apperceive the AutoMARK can acquaint you how it has apparent a acclamation or if the appearance failed. I’m not actuality to altercate if the sky is falling or not. Nor am I actuality to altercate appraisement or machines and companies not in the article. You said the bulk to Marin canton (who LIKES their machines) is $45,588 per E-Vote, which is apparent amiss if they were partially reimbursed by the Feds, but I’m not discussing that either. I am pointing out that it is big-ticket to board bodies with disabilities, but we as a association accept absitively that is worthwhile. The courthouse in Loving County, Texas has a wheelchair admission that will allegedly never see a wheelchair, but we accept absitively to accomplish things attainable akin admitting it isn’t consistently cost-effective or cheap.

COMMENT #21 [Permalink]… Linda said on 11/26/2007 @ 11:39 am PT…

Dear Juliette,

The activity actuality is NOT that aborigine money should not be spent to board some bedridden voters with a way to vote privately. The activity IS that truckloads of aborigine money should NOT be indiscriminately befuddled into a den of lobbying thieves and liars who are bribery our legislators to acquiesce them to board us with a apocryphal band-aid to one problem, while accouterment us with a huge affluence of akin added vote accretion problems than we could anytime acquaintance afterwards their “solution.”

THAT is the apocryphal altercation I am apropos to.

Sure! Let’s board a way for those authentic bedridden voters to vote privately, and let’s accomplish abiding that way doesn’t attenuate our acclamation process!!! How on apple can this be commodity that anyone added than those who are financially benefitting from the civic voting accoutrement hustle could commodity to?!

COMMENT #22 [Permalink]… Brad Friedman said on 11/26/2007 @ 1:04 pm PT…

Juliette –

Perhaps one of the problems here, that Linda highlights a bit in her animadversion above, is that we are not ambidextrous with a Red/Blue, Left/Right, Republican/Democratic, Liberal/Conservative, With Us/Or Adjoin us activity here, as abounding accept arise to apprehend in our accepted culture. I’d altercate that best such issues are not that way, admitting the Corporate MSM’s absorption in painting them that way.

This is not a bulk of actuality in favor or adjoin AutoMARKs. Or in favor or adjoin disabled/blind voters adapted to casting a acclamation in a secure, private, absolute manner. Admitting the closing has been used, by cretins and the under-informed alike, to advance for “solutions” which ultimately do added abuse than good.

You’ll agenda if you re-review my aboriginal article, I never said “AutoMARKS are bad”. Nor did I say, “we shouldn’t absorb money to acquiesce blind/disabled voters the aforementioned rights others enjoy”.

I did, however, abode on the afield aerial bulk of machines that are advisedly over-priced by a aggregation which has proven, in the words of CA SoS Debra Bowen to accept “ignored the law over and over and over again”.

I additionally acclaimed that the Registrar of Marin is blame to abide alive that law breaking corporation, at tax payer expense, to use machines that are not certified for use in California and were secretly and illegally deployed by ES&S.

That’s no way to run an American election, if you ask me. And it’s not about Dark people: For ’em or adjoin ’em? AutoMARKs: For ’em or adjoin ’em?!

It’s about what the hell is activity on here, and how to highlight the boondoggle that Linda accent smartly in her comments above.

If you are accommodating to accord a canyon to all anatomy of corruption, extortion, heavy-handed business practices, bilking of tax dollars, to use an actionable arrangement with ambiguous (largely untested) candor at any and all cost, artlessly so that a absolute baby articulation of the citizenry can maybe accept their votes counted accurately (no affidavit necessary), that’s up to you.

I’m not so willing, and accept that those who appetite our “business”, via the inappropriate privatization of our attainable elections, charge to accomplish a helluva lot bigger afore we action afresh a distinct dime. For anything.

Hope that helps, and that you apprehend this (and the added replies I’ve accustomed you) in the spirit in which they are intended.

COMMENT #23 [Permalink]… Jethro said on 11/26/2007 @ 2:08 pm PT…

Brad, I see you were able to aberration Juliette’s animadversion into a agitation over ES&S accessories rather than the point of her antecedent remark. She was bringing apprehension to the falacious aspects of your altercation attempting to affix the evils of cyberbanking voting to the bulk associated with authoritative the adapted to vote abreast attainable to ALL citizens. Animadversion all you ambition on the AutoMark actuality an cher allotment of junk, or your abhorrence of some all-inclusive cabal to rig our elections, or the bulk of these machines per aborigine application the aborigine turnout; but aback you abstract a association of voters and intentioally point your feel at how big-ticket it is to acquiesce them to vote you advance that this bulk is a burdgen too ample for association to bear. What boyhood accumulation do you plan to advance next? How about artful the bulk for anniversary Chinese American to vote in Marin county?

Call HAVA a boondoggle if you wish, but I am absolutely assertive I abide a affiliate of the federal association to which these machines are advised to benefit. Are you asserting that disabled Americans accept no bulk in American Society? I assumption in your ageism assessment we are aloof too big-ticket to be a allotment of your society. It charge be nice actuality a adolescent of privilege.

Brad, I would adulation to apprehend added from you apropos the acumen Bruce McPhereson “refused” to accredit the Vote-PAD. Any abstraction aback the makers of Vote-PAD plan to accept it Federally certified, so that it can get certified in California? Accept you looked carefully at this product? How do you apperceive the Excel macros are creating the audio instructions accurately and in the able challenge adjustment afterwards certification? How do you apperceive this bell-ringer is credible? Should America aloof booty your word?

How do you adduce a burghal like Chicago use the Vote-PAD? Chicago has about 3000 precincts with hundreds of belt akin challenge creating hundreds of different ballots. This arrangement ability assignment in a absolute actual baby jurisdiction, but it is logistically prohibitive to ample jurisdictions such as Chicago. The accepted Vote-PAD amalgamation they advertise is for a one belt one acclamation acclamation at a bulk of $2000 to $2200. Is that bargain consdering what is included in the accepted package? I achievement not. Accept you advised the bulk of activity appropriate to bureaucracy this artefact for anniversary different ballot? Acceptable luck ambience up February’s primary in Chicago or akin Marin county. I anticipate the Vote-PAD shows promise, but like ALL voting solutions it is FAR from prefect. I see your attack to abuse Bruce McPherson for “refusing” to certifying this artefact as sensationalized journalism angle the accuracy through ommission.

COMMENT #24 [Permalink]… Linda said on 11/26/2007 @ 2:36 pm PT…

Well, it appears that there are some participants actuality who would rather abstract the altercation from the allusive one about the abandoned bulk to the American aborigine of these cheap, base machines, and accomplish up one about a perceived ageism adjoin spending any money at all to advice some bedridden voters vote secretly.

This is EXACTLY what FoxNews does, and is the acumen I broken my cable TV 11 years ago and no best accept to the mal-information attainable on those airwaves.

Brad, I accede that this accomplished voting accoutrement boondoggle has been a huge cheat to the American taxpayer. The added seven citizens who formed with me at my voting belt in Nov. 2006 were of a agnate opinion, and in my authentic amphitheater of accompany who are abreast about this activity and so accept allusive opinions, there is accepted acceding that we taxpayers accept been royally ripped off by this HAVA expenditure.

Thanks for advertisement this. If others accede this to be sensationalism, well, that is their right.

Heck, there are STILL bodies about who anticipate Saddam Hussein was complex in 9/11, and that WMDs accept been activate in Iraq, so go amount …

COMMENT #25 [Permalink]… Chris Hooten said on 11/26/2007 @ 3:50 pm PT…

Jethro, Juliette:Sheesh, stop aggravating to aberration this into an anti-handicapped-individual thing. Nobody, bedridden or not, needs an anytime complicated, hackable, mistake-prone, and blasphemous big-ticket computerized voting apparatus. Accord me a break. It doesn’t account anyone(well, voters anyways). I can’t accept your intentions to acrylic this as an anti-handicapped issue, added than to draw absorption abroad from the absolute problem. I don’t affliction if you are bedridden or not, I don’t appetite my vote stolen/adjusted/hacked aloof so you can use a big adorned machine. And there are added cheaper, simpler solutions available.Nobody actuality hates bedridden people, so abdicate aggravating to advertise that turd here.

COMMENT #26 [Permalink]… jethro said on 11/26/2007 @ 4:30 pm PT…

Linda, I anticipate you’re selectively reading. It’s bright that no one you affliction about suffers from a disability. I adulation that you use the chat “handicapped” while refering to us “some participants actuality who would rather abstract the discussion”. Is that black ancestors still active in your neighborhood?

I’ll try this one added time. I do not altercate that these machines are applesauce and charge MAJOR improvements in the absolute system. I am arguing that alienating the citizenry that these tax dollar were advised to advice is disrespectful. This blog insinuates that the bulk of accouterment the adapted to vote to disabled Americans is too aerial for able bodied America to bear.

Have any of you anytime had to accept addition abroad ample out your ballot? Never mind, that’s adapted you can do it yourself. Strangely abundant I additionally adopt to vote apart akin if the arrangement needs approaching improvements. What are you so abashed of the aegis accident that these machines present aback beneath than one vote per acclamation per accoutrement is accepting cast? Accord me a break.

Is bloom affliction for the aged additionally a bad idea? How do you feel about Social Security? Should these concepts be befuddled out too because you accept a bloom affliction and a alimony and feel the bulk is too high?

btw Linda, how are Saddam Hussein or WMDs in Iraq akin accidentally conected to alienating a boyhood population? I anticipate it ability be a acceptable time to booty the antithesis off you head.

COMMENT #27 [Permalink]… Linda said on 11/26/2007 @ 4:52 pm PT…

Dear Jethro,

Re “It’s bright that no one you affliction about suffers from a disability.” It’s bright to me that you’ve got yourself one huge axe to grind, aback you apperceive absolutely annihilation about my captivation with ancestors members, friends, and citizens who accept physical/mental handicaps/disabilities that ability anticipate them from actuality able to casting a abstruse vote. So bullwork away, Jethro. And accumulate up the chat parsing. It’s so … distracting.

Re “Is bloom affliction for the aged additionally a bad idea? How do you feel about Social Security? Should these concepts be befuddled out too because you accept a bloom affliction and a alimony and feel the bulk is too high?” Added affirmation that you are a able axe-grinder since, already again, you accept no ability whatsoever about how I ability be administering my efforts adjoin these issues.

Re “Have any of you anytime had to accept addition abroad ample out your ballot?” Yes. Any added questions?

Re “What are you so abashed of the aegis accident that these machines present aback beneath than one vote per acclamation per accoutrement is accepting cast?” I’m not frightened, Jethro. I’m abreast about them. Big difference. And the actuality that beneath than one vote per acclamation per accoutrement is accepting casting is a GOOD thing, accustomed how adverse they are to the autonomous vote process.

And Jethro, Saddam and WMDs are two agitating examples of means in which Americans are angrily apprenticed and uninformed. Therefore, it ties in beautifully with the misinformation circulating actuality about some perceived “fear” of “security risk(s)” airish by “these machines.”

And afterwards and I DO beggarly lastly, as I will not be aback to allege with you again, re “I am arguing that alienating the citizenry that these tax dollar were advised to advice is disrespectful.” No citizenry has been alienated here, Jethro. Aloof you and possibly Juliette. Apologetic you feel “disrespected,” but that’s your perceived problem, as I feel it doesn’t akin exist.

COMMENT #28 [Permalink]… Agent 99 said on 11/26/2007 @ 5:18 pm PT…

Where the hell is the_zapkitty aback we charge him?

COMMENT #29 [Permalink]… jethro said on 11/26/2007 @ 5:29 pm PT…

Chris, It’s auspicious that your animadversion are so predictable.

It doesn’t account anyone(well, voters anyways).

I do accept I am a voter. So, should I accede myself alone from the ambit of the appellation “anyone”. Should I additionally balloon that I abide to be an American citizen?

I don’t affliction if you are bedridden or not, I don’t appetite my vote stolen/adjusted/hacked aloof so you can use a big adorned machine.

How is your vote in any way accompanying to mine? The blog aloft acutely states that alone 17 votes were casting over two elections. Do you absolutely anticipate addition can rig an acclamation by altering an boilerplate of 8.5 votes per acclamation casting on these alarming machines. Not absolutely a prime ambition to hack. I doubtable award bags of votes casting with alone 9 voters application the accoutrement ability accession a red flag.

Chris, could you amuse accord me a book area these 17 voters can account you vote to be stolen/adjusted/hacke while I’m application this not so big but semi-fancy machine? I like that your paranoia trumps my adapted to vote. You bigger accumulate an eye on us “handicapped people” aback we are allotment of that all-inclusive cabal to accommodation your vote and absorb your tax dollars.

And there are added cheaper, simpler solutions available.

Well, Chris could you point out one cheaper, simpler band-aid that is certified for use in California? The low tech, cheaper band-aid Brad mentioned in this blog cannot get Certified in California afterwards Federal certification. The makers of Vote-PAD do not feel their artefact needs to be certified. What do they accept to hide?

Chris if you apperceive of added cheaper, simpler solutions not mentioned by Brad amuse accompany me up to speed. Especially, if they accept Federal Acceptance because if they don’t afresh calling them a band-aid would be an poor use of the chat solution.

Nobody actuality hates bedridden people, so abdicate aggravating to advertise that turd here.

Then Chris abdicate aggravating to advertise the paranoia that 17 vote over two elections somehow puts your vote at accident turd.

I attending advanced to account how you adduce those 8.5 votes per acclamation are activity adapt YOUR vote.

COMMENT #30 [Permalink]… jethro said on 11/26/2007 @ 5:41 pm PT…

11 popular disconnected undercuts hairstyles for men men
11 popular disconnected undercuts hairstyles for men men | disconnected undercut side part

Linda, assuredly we agree:

…it ties in beautifully with the misinformation circulating actuality about some perceived “fear” of “security risk(s)” airish by “these machines.”

With alone 17 votes casting over two elections I it is a perceived “fear” of “security risk(s)” airish by “these machines”.

COMMENT #31 [Permalink]… Chris Hooten said on 11/26/2007 @ 8:12 pm PT…

Are you semi computer benighted or something? One computer can be compromised, It thusly can accommodation the axial tabulator, and the absolute acclamation adapted about addition wants. Jethro, application these computers is arduous folly. What is it, inherently, that makes them added acceptable than added abundant added defended and simple alternatives? *One* accoutrement acclimated *once* can adapt the after-effects of an absolute election. That is unacceptable whether the users are bedridden or not. These vulnerabilies accept been activate in all accepted computerized voting machines. You are alpha to aroma like a voting accoutrement aggregation shill, and not addition aloof absorbed in easier admission to voting for disabled, blind, or deafened individuals.Put simply, these machines blot absolute ass, and bodies with appropriate needs deserve abundant better.

COMMENT #32 [Permalink]… Brad Friedman said on 11/26/2007 @ 8:53 pm PT…

Jethro is added than “begining to aroma like a voting accoutrement aggregation shill,” Chris. It’s acceptable little accompaniment that he’s anchored in Sacramento autograph his nonsense.

I’d accept agitated to booty him seriously, as I did Juliette, but for a few asleep accord aways alpha (but absolutely not catastrophe with: “your abhorrence of some all-inclusive cabal to rig our elections”

That’s wingnut/machine rep talking point #1. (For the record, I don’t abhorrence a “vast conspiracy”, I abhorrence aloof the one actuality accustomed as able to cast an absolute acclamation beyond an absolute county, and appropriately absolute state, as University of California, Princeton, et al has acicular out time and again)

After that, his awning is absolutely absolute with the capacity he knows about Vote-PAD and talking point #37 out of the playbook about why McPherson torpedoed it. Followed by #38 which misleads, “What does she accept to hide?!”

Yes, the guy’s a pro.

That said, if he’s accommodating to put his absolute name on his work, I’ll be blessed to abide the chat with him. Like a developed up (give it a try “Jethro”!) But I’m not absorbed in absolution him bung off disinfo point afterwards disinfo point abaft his accepted and abashed dark of secrecy.

One point, however: I am in draft with affluence of dark and disabled association who appetite annihilation to do with these abominable machines and accede the absolute activity the aforementioned boondoggle I do. They accept been abundant supporters of our assignment at BRAD BLOG for years. From associates of Bowen’s TTBR team, to association at the NFB (yes, the aforementioned NFB who accustomed $1 actor from Diebold) to dark and disabled Acclamation Candor advocates beyond the nation.

It’s acceptable that Autonomous politicians bend and apple-polish in abhorrence at the horse bits (Talking credibility #10 – #18) hurled by association like “Jethro” and Jim Dickson, but I don’t.

If you feel like accepting a accepted altercation on these points, “Jethro”, let me know. You’ve got my email address. But alone aback you’re accommodating to arise out of the closet, which I don’t doubtable you will, aback you’d acceptable afresh accept to acknowledge your authentic “disability” or abridgement thereof. Which I doubtable you’ll be far too abashed to do. As best of you guys are.

Beyond that, acceptable luck to you. Accumulate up the bad work! It’s alone your our capitalism at stake.

COMMENT #33 [Permalink]… jethro said on 11/26/2007 @ 9:08 pm PT…

I’m not the one claiming that they are secure. I accede these machines accept abundant to be improved. I’m alone allurement that you abutment your assertions.

Chris, I asked for a book of how your fears could absolutely happen. Not some abstract b.s. about it actuality possible. How could 8.5 votes alloy to account arrangement aback the adorned accoutrement you’re abashed of is alone press the acclamation for me which is afresh run through an optical scanner aloof like castigation ballot. What you’re asserting is in no way affiliated to my vote. I’m appealing abiding I asked you to call a adjustment area MY vote can anon adapt YOUR vote. Telling me that the a accoutrement I use to actualize a acclamation that is not affiliated to the one scanning the ballots can adapt YOUR vote in absurd.

I additionally asked for some examples of the bargain solutions you mentioned beforehand that would acquiesce me to vote. You additionally acknowledgment them in afresh in your acknowledgment but I accept no abstraction who they are. I would adulation to analysis these solutions you mention. Would you amuse armpit these solution?

COMMENT #34 [Permalink]… Agent 99 said on 11/26/2007 @ 9:17 pm PT…

Jethro

Just go apprehend some of the bags of posts actuality on the accountable if you’re not a abettor or a troll. I don’t accept any backbone for bodies who agilely aberration others’ statements and you’re activity on balance chain until you accept either agitated to brainwash yourself abundant to appoint in a absolute discussion, or you aloof dry up and draft away, if you don’t cut it out absolutely soon.

COMMENT #35 [Permalink]… Brad Friedman said on 11/26/2007 @ 9:52 pm PT…

Jethro said:

I’m not the one claiming that they are secure. I accede these machines accept abundant to be improved. I’m alone allurement that you abutment your assertions.

No. You’re not. Not by a continued shot. And, of course, you apperceive that. If you don’t (and you do), aloof go apprehend your assize at #23 wherein you declared claims that accept never been fabricated and all bulk of Fox-worthy attacks, insinuations, strawman arguments and accompanying canards.

I’ve been in a agitation or two in my lifetime. I’ve run the able Ann Coulter off the air. I apperceive aback addition is authoritative a accepted appeal to “support assertions” and aback addition is a abettor and a ringer.

You accept bootless the analysis my friend. Akin if it’s alone a accompaniment that you’re based aloof alfresco of Sacramento, of course.

Be added accurate abutting time. You could accept succeeded in overextension a accomplished lot added disinfo afore accepting pegged, but you attack your amount way too early. Looks like it’s aback to training academy with ya!

COMMENT #36 [Permalink]… the_zapkitty said on 11/27/2007 @ 4:51 am PT…

… Agent 99 inquired…

“Where the hell is the_zapkitty aback we charge him?”

Ack… I’m apologetic I absent the party. I’ve been ambidextrous with bloom issues.

COMMENT #37 [Permalink]… jethro said on 11/27/2007 @ 11:52 am PT…

Call me what you will.

Brad said:

I’ve been in a agitation or two in my lifetime.

I’d be accommodating to bet if it was a REAL agitation acute you to abutment your arguments with affirmation you lost. Sticking to the activity with acknowledging affirmation (at atomic based on this attack at dialog) does not arise to be one of your strengths.

I doubtable addition who admired to absolutely agitation an activity would not ask a actuality to email them to accomplishment to altercation abroad from the account eyes of their minion.

Nor, would REAL agitation aberrate from the activity by aggravating to abstract from the activity by authoritative accusations that are not accompanying to the activity of the debate.

Your buddies actuality accept awning names like “Agent 99” and “the_zapkitty” and you appetite to accord me affliction for application the awning name “jethro” rather that abode the topic. Wow, I’m abiding that action wins the agitation every time. It ability assignment actuality in Fantasy Land, but it won’t do abundant in a cloister of law.

What I’ve abstruse about Vote-PAD all came from the Vote-PAD website sited in the blog above. If you accept issues with association analytic your assertions you ability accede account the advice on the website afore authoritative claims that addition “refused” to accredit it. Amuse apprehend http://www.vote-pad.us/FederalCertification.asp and you can apprehend for yourself why Bruce McPherson was UNABLE to accredit it for use in California. (Assuming you absolutely are accustomed with California law) I asked Brad to altercate this added but he was too active researching my IP abode and creating smoke and mirrors to accumulate from acclamation my questions.

I still anticipate the Vote-PAD could be a abundant band-aid for a baby jurisdiction. The architect aloof needs to get it certified Federally. I asked you to altercate this but you acquainted alienated the activity was a added able adjustment of debate.

Asking you to abutment you belief with commodity added that acuteness should not offend. Artlessly abutment your claims with evidence. Although, I do adore account fiction.

Unfortunately, I doubtable I’ll aloof accept added name calling rather than absolute chat to which I will abutting with “I apperceive you are, but what am I”

COMMENT #38 [Permalink]… Brad Friedman said on 11/27/2007 @ 7:58 pm PT…

“Jethro” said:

Wow, I’m abiding that action wins the agitation every time. It ability assignment actuality in Fantasy Land, but it won’t do abundant in a cloister of law.

When you acquisition one that will let you altercate your case artlessly as “Jethro” amuse let me know.

My almanac on debating and aggregate abroad is an attainable book. And it’s done below my name. All of it. (You can feel chargeless to accept to the agitation with Coulter on Ron Insana’s appearance and hundreds others like it all attainable actuality on BRAD BLOG. Knock yourself out.)

The acumen I requested you acquaintance me via Email was so that your absolute name would be kept arcane if you adopted it that way. Short of that, aback your capital achievement seems to be to bulb disinfo and strawman arguments (eg. “your abhorrence of some all-inclusive cabal to rig our elections” and “What does she accept to hide?!” et al) I’m not decidedly absorbed in accepting a agitation with a phony.

Demonstrate that you are not such a phony. You can do so by contacting me via email, area your character will be kept private, and we can abide the issue. We can akin do so publicly, already it’s accustomed that you’re not the abettor you arise to be.

As mentioned, I agnosticism you’ll bother to out yourself. Akin to me.

COMMENT #39 [Permalink]… Chris Hooten said on 11/27/2007 @ 10:15 pm PT…

*Yawn*

Jethro, Jethro, Jethro…

“Nor, would REAL agitation aberrate from the activity by aggravating to abstract from the activity by authoritative accusations that are not accompanying to the activity of the debate.

Hmmm, like appearance bodies as anti-handicapped, aback the absolute activity is acclamation candor and security? Hahahah haha hahBrad has *already* accurate his arguments with copious amounts of acknowledging evidence, you aloof haven’t apprehend it yet, apparently. If your job is aggravating to misinform this blog, you accept already failed.

COMMENT #40 [Permalink]… Chris Hooten said on 11/27/2007 @ 10:36 pm PT…

Actually, to be fair, this specific commodity was added about the gigantic cheat that these machines represent to the voters (who additionally pay taxes). But the capital activity is that these machines are insecure, and there is no affiance that anyone’s vote will be appropriately archival aback these machines are used, whether the actuality is bedridden or not.

Men’s hair, haircuts, fade haircuts, short, medium, long, buzzed | disconnected undercut side part

Welcome in order to the website, in this moment I’m going to teach you about keyword. And today, here is the primary picture:

Disconnected undercut hairstyles to rock in 11 | all things hair ph disconnected undercut side part
Disconnected undercut hairstyles to rock in 11 | all things hair ph disconnected undercut side part | disconnected undercut side part

Why don’t you consider impression above? is of which incredible???. if you believe thus, I’l t demonstrate a number of photograph once again below:

So, if you’d like to receive the magnificent pics about (11 Disconnected Undercut Side Part), press save icon to download these graphics for your pc. They are available for download, if you love and wish to have it, simply click save badge on the post, and it will be instantly downloaded in your desktop computer.} Finally if you desire to have new and recent photo related to (11 Disconnected Undercut Side Part), please follow us on google plus or bookmark this blog, we attempt our best to give you regular update with fresh and new graphics. We do hope you enjoy staying right here. For some updates and recent news about (11 Disconnected Undercut Side Part) images, please kindly follow us on tweets, path, Instagram and google plus, or you mark this page on book mark section, We attempt to offer you up-date periodically with all new and fresh graphics, love your browsing, and find the best for you.

Thanks for visiting our website, contentabove (11 Disconnected Undercut Side Part) published .  Today we are delighted to announce that we have discovered an extremelyinteresting nicheto be reviewed, that is (11 Disconnected Undercut Side Part) Many individuals attempting to find details about(11 Disconnected Undercut Side Part) and of course one of them is you, is not it?

11 disconnected undercut hairstyles haircuts (11 update) disconnected undercut side part
11 disconnected undercut hairstyles haircuts (11 update) disconnected undercut side part | disconnected undercut side part
High taper disconnected #menshairdesign #grooming #gqbarberlounge
High taper disconnected #menshairdesign #grooming #gqbarberlounge | disconnected undercut side part
Disconnected undercut haircut | shaved in side part | side swept | gentlehair disconnected undercut side part
Disconnected undercut haircut | shaved in side part | side swept | gentlehair disconnected undercut side part | disconnected undercut side part
Men’s hairstyle ♦ disconnected undercut ♦ modern quiff & shining sidepart ♦ helium™ disconnected undercut side part | disconnected undercut side part
11 popular disconnected undercuts hairstyles for men men
11 popular disconnected undercuts hairstyles for men men | disconnected undercut side part